9.21.23

In the secular world, trials are a common and expected part of the legal system. However, when it comes to a trial within the walls of a church, it carries a weight of embarrassment and sadness. Among all communities, the church is expected to be a place where matters are resolved amicably. When individuals encounter conflicts with one another, they typically engage in discussions guided by grace and, at the least, aim to attain a “Just Resolution.” Regrettably, in this instance, that ideal has not been met. Instead, the entire world is now watching, taking note of the Christian community and the church’s proceedings in The United Methodist Church.

Regardless of the verdict’s outcome, it is painfully evident that our community is deeply fractured and suffering. Bearing witness to the testimonies of both the complainants and the respondent has been disheartening. I deeply empathize with Bishop Carcaño’s experiences, the denomination’s first Latina bishop, recognizing that many other clergy members have likely endured similar struggles. The pain of my colleagues is palpable, and the damage inflicted is painfully clear.

This case is marked by a shattered sacred trust, riddled with misunderstandings, false expectations, marred perceptions, and a pervasive lack of communication. It has unfolded in a culture of suspicion where everyone feels entitled, violated, and convinced of their own righteousness while undermining the Bishop’s authority. All of this occurred amid the backdrop of a global pandemic, further complicating matters with accusers and the accused, self-interest, power struggles, and imbalances. Implicit bias, race, and gender also contribute to the situation. The jury must carefully discern a complicated case and ask, “What are the facts?” “What is truth?” Ultimately, its resolution will hinge upon the Book of Discipline and, perhaps, our Wesleyan theology of grace.

This particular situation, it appears that like-minded individuals were recruited to amplify their stance, as if growing in numbers could validate their position. This situation brings to mind the trial of Jesus, where numerical strength also played a role in his crucifixion.

In this trial, there are no victors; the church bears the heavy cost of the harm done. Whether a guilty or innocent verdict is reached, it cannot erase the damage inflicted. At the very least, this trial has been heart-wrenching, but it also offers valuable lessons.

My experience with Bishop Carcano while serving on the General Commission on Religion and Race (GCORR) Board from 2012 to 2016 was incredibly positive and truly inspiring.

In any scenario, my fervent hope and prayer are that all charges against Bishop Carcaño will be acquitted.

Sela Finau

Update 9.22.23 Bishop Minerva Carcaño was found Not Guilty on all charges. Amen.